One senior team,
tuned to your sector.
Digital problems rhyme across industries, but the constraints don't: a store fears replatforming, a SaaS team fears flat pipeline, a startup fears the runway. Each page below maps what your sector is actually up against to the services that answer it.
Free review · Yours to keep · Direct or white-label
PixelCrayons serves eight sectors with the same senior team. eCommerce and D2C brands, B2B SaaS, funded startups, healthcare, education, real estate & construction, dental and home services. The services underneath are shared: development, marketing, design and AI. But each engagement is scoped around the sector's own constraints, not a generic package. 4,500+ projects delivered since 2004, direct for brands and white-label for agencies.
Eight industries,
one delivery bench.
Each page maps the sector's real constraints to the services that answer them, and features a published case only where one genuinely matches. No invented vertical trophies, just routing to the work.
The sector changes.
The standards don't.
Whichever page you land on, the engagement underneath is built the same way: a named senior team rather than a rotating cast, an itemised proposal, and the same three-step start: see the published work, take the free website review, then scope a proposal. The cadence is documented on our process page, the pricing shapes are public, and the case studies carry their numbers with them. Sector knowledge changes what we recommend. It never changes how the work is scoped, reported and handed over.
One thing you won't find on these pages: invented vertical trophies. We don't claim "50+ clients" in a sector we can't substantiate, and we don't rebadge stock stats per industry. The aggregate record is the record: 4,500+ projects delivered since 2004. Where a published case genuinely matches a sector, that page features it. Where none does yet, the page says so.
What sector experience
actually changes.
Vertical expertise is the most oversold thing in agency marketing. Here is the part that is real, and the part that is not.
What does not change by sector
- Technical SEO. A crawl-budget problem (search engines fetching the wrong pages) is the same problem whether the catalogue sells implants or trainers.
- Page performance. The Core Web Vitals fixes (Google's page-speed scores) that work on a SaaS marketing site work identically on a clinic site.
- Build quality. Accessible markup, sensible state management and a maintainable component tree are not sector opinions.
- How an engagement runs. Named team, itemised proposal, a weekly review in Prism, documented handover: same in every vertical.
What genuinely does change
- What you are allowed to say. Regulated sectors constrain claims before a word of copy is written. A writer who learns that mid-project has already cost you a review cycle.
- Where the buyer actually decides. A funded startup's evaluation runs in days on a founder's laptop. An education purchase runs for a term through a committee. The funnel shape follows.
- Which integrations are non-negotiable. A booking system, a learning platform, a practice-management system or a payment gateway is often the fixed point the rest of the build has to move around.
- What proof persuades. A conversion-rate lift convinces a D2C operator and does nothing for a hospital administrator who needs to know about data handling first.
Which is why the sector pages below map constraints to services rather than reciting vertical credentials. Where a published case genuinely matches your sector, that page features it. Where none does yet, the page says so instead of borrowing one.
Skip the directory. Send the website.
A senior strategist records five minutes on your website: speed, search rankings, AI visibility, conversion leaks. Yours to keep, no strings. Whatever your sector, it's the fastest way to find out what we'd fix first, and if the answer is that you don't need an agency yet, the recording says that too.
No retainer required · Yours to keep
Your engagement, week to week,
in one workspace.
Whatever your sector, where the engagement includes it, the work runs in one Prism workspace you log into: requests, approvals, tasks and the weekly review, with each decision recorded.
- 01
Requests and approvals
One queue, one owner, one due date.
- 02
Weekly review
Each decision recorded, with the expectation attached.
- 03
Actions checked against outcome
What we did and what happened, side by side.
Our commitments
Each one says where it applies and links to its full terms.
Response and start times
We typically respond within four business hours. Eligible engagements can typically start within two to three business days after scope, payment and required access are confirmed.
Business hours are Monday to Friday, 9:00 am to 6:00 pm IST, excluding published company holidays. Typical expectations, not guaranteed service levels.
Full termsClear IP & Ownership Terms
Your materials remain yours. Bespoke deliverable rights, licences and handover are agreed before work starts.
All engagements.
Full termsClear Delivery & Escalation Ownership
Know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue.
All engagements. Roles may be combined and vary with your engagement.
Full termsQuestions buyers ask before they commit
How will we know what you are doing?
Before work starts we agree how often you get updates, what the reports cover and who sends them. You know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue. For hourly and retainer work, time is recorded in Workstatus, so you can see the time records behind your invoice.
Why pay you rather than a local agency?
We quote each engagement in a written proposal, and the initial consultation, standard proposal and straightforward scoping are free. The proposal states the deliverables, exclusions, fees and currency, payment milestones and any third-party costs, so you can compare it line by line with a local quote. You can buy one service or several, and keep the providers you already have.
Who owns the ad accounts, the data and the work?
Your materials, data and accounts remain yours, and we prefer to work in advertising and analytics accounts you own, with access delegated to our team. Agreed ownership rights in bespoke deliverables transfer under the engagement terms and applicable payment; third-party software and assets keep their licences. We do not withhold customer-owned data or accounts over a payment dispute.
What if we want to stop?
Cancellation, notice and any renewal terms are written into your proposal or statement of work before you accept it. If an engagement ends early, we hand over completed, paid-for work and list any unfinished work separately. For an eligible specialist trial, you can stop within the trial window and pay nothing for eligible trial hours.
How we handle claims, credentials and your data: group credentials, dated ratings, how case figures are signed off, client permissions and data handling.
Frequently
asked.
For the technical layer, no: a crawl budget problem, a Core Web Vitals failure or a checkout bug behaves the same in every sector. For the commercial layer, yes: what you are allowed to claim, who signs off, how long the decision takes and what proof persuades are all sector-specific. Getting them wrong costs review cycles rather than rankings. We are explicit on each page about which kind of problem we are solving for you.
Usually, and the six are the sectors we are asked for most rather than the limit of what we take on. The filter is whether your constraint resembles one we have solved: a regulated claims process, a long committee purchase, a catalogue at scale, a technical buyer. Describe the situation and you will get a straight answer, including a no where a specialist would serve you better.
Because we cannot substantiate them per sector, and a rebadged statistic is a fabrication with better formatting. The aggregate record is the record. Where a published case study genuinely matches a sector, that page features it. Where none does yet, the page says so rather than borrowing proof from an adjacent vertical.
The specialists are the same senior bench. What changes is the briefing they get and the constraints written into the scope: compliance boundaries, required integrations, the approval chain. Sector knowledge changes what we recommend and how the work is framed; it does not mean a different, unnamed team appears behind the sector page you clicked.
By treating it as a scoping input rather than a final review step. Claim constraints, data-handling requirements and approval routes are agreed before copy or build starts, and the proposal names who signs off on what. That is the difference between compliance costing you a fortnight at the end and costing you an hour at the beginning.
Start with the constraint rather than the label. Each page opens by naming what that sector is genuinely up against and maps it to the services that answer it. So the fastest route is to read the constraint paragraph on two or three pages and pick whichever describes your situation most accurately, even if its sector heading is not an exact match for your business.
Bring us the constraint.
Keep the plan.
Tell us what your sector is squeezing you on: acquisition, platform, pipeline, runway. A senior strategist will map the way through. A proposal if you want one; no obligation if you don't.
Reply within four business hours (typical) · NDA standard · Direct or white-label
Last updated