You have a marketing agency, a dev shop, a designer and an AI consultant. None of them talk to each other, and you hold it together as the unpaid project manager. Instead, get one senior team across all four skills. You get one plan, one report and one person who answers for the result.
Reply within four business hours (typical) · One weekly report · NDA standard
Brands our teams have delivered for
PixelCrayons replaces your suppliers with one team: marketing, development, design and AI on one plan, answerable for one number. You know who coordinates the work, who owns it and who to call if something goes wrong. Reports are tied to revenue. We start with one service and take on the rest as your other contracts end.
Real projects for real clients, with results we can show.
Product names and marks are trademarks of their owners. Naming a technology means our teams build with it. It does not mean a partnership, certification or endorsement.
The strategy leaves the agency's slides in full and reaches the dev shop as a Trello card. Each time a brief changes hands, it loses detail. Why does the page exist? What did the campaign promise? Which number does it serve? What finally goes live looks like the plan the way a photocopy of a photocopy looks like the original.
Traffic dips. The SEO agency blames the developers' release. The developers blame the redesign, and the designer blames the brief. Each one is right, and that's the problem. When four suppliers each own a piece, a miss belongs to nobody. You spend the review settling arguments instead of fixing things.
You pass decisions between suppliers, explain things again and run the calls where they finally meet. Coordinating them is a real job, and you're doing it for free. You pay four specialists and do the fifth job yourself. Yet that job decides whether the other four help each other or clash.
The ads agency works on spend. The SEO agency works on rankings. The developers work on speed of delivery. Revenue, the number it all exists for, is nobody's target. Each supplier can hit its target in a quarter when your business misses its own. That isn't four separate failures. It's one problem with how the work is set up.
One senior team does everything your suppliers do now, as integrated digital marketing services. Each page below explains one part in full.
You don't have to move at once. We start with one service and take on the rest as your other contracts end. Our process and pricing are public, so you can check how it works before you move anything.
We sign an NDA and map who does what now, when each contract ends and where handovers break down. You keep the map either way.
We confirm the date your proposal arrives. It says which service moves first and what stays put. It compares the cost like for like with your current invoices.
You confirm the scope, the payment and the access we need. Nothing starts before this.
One team takes over the first service and starts delivering while your other suppliers keep working.
The first service's work goes live. As each supplier's contract ends, its work joins the same plan and the same weekly report.
Prism is the client workspace where your requests, approvals, tasks and weekly reviews live.
A solution spans several disciplines. Some engagements include Prism, our client workspace, and your proposal says whether yours does. Where it does, the work runs in one workspace you log into: one request queue, one task list and one weekly review across all of it.
One request list, one task list, one review.
Each decision recorded, with the expectation attached.
Fully loaded. Unmeasured spend shows as unknown, never zero.
Topical authority plus answer-engine optimisation (AEO): structured data, answer-first content, entity cleanup. Organic up 127% in five months, with citations in AI Overviews for money queries.
Founder & CEO
An entrepreneur at heart. He links business analysis, strategy, clear goals and ROI to practical technology.
LinkedIn →
Technical Manager
Brings technical work, client updates and project management together, so work moves smoothly from brief to launch.
LinkedIn →Every engagement
Know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue.
All engagements. Roles may be combined and vary with your engagement.
Each one says where it applies and links to its full terms.
We typically respond within four business hours. Eligible engagements can typically start within two to three business days after scope, payment and required access are confirmed.
Business hours are Monday to Friday, 9:00 am to 6:00 pm IST, excluding published company holidays. Typical expectations, not guaranteed service levels.
Full termsYour materials remain yours. Bespoke deliverable rights, licences and handover are agreed before work starts.
All engagements.
Full termsKnow who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue.
All engagements. Roles may be combined and vary with your engagement.
Full termsBefore work starts we agree how often you get updates, what the reports cover and who sends them. You know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue. For hourly and retainer work, time is recorded in Workstatus, so you can see the time records behind your invoice.
We quote each engagement in a written proposal, and the initial consultation, standard proposal and straightforward scoping are free. The proposal states the deliverables, exclusions, fees and currency, payment milestones and any third-party costs, so you can compare it line by line with a local quote. You can buy one service or several, and keep the providers you already have.
Your materials, data and accounts remain yours, and we prefer to work in advertising and analytics accounts you own, with access delegated to our team. Agreed ownership rights in bespoke deliverables transfer under the engagement terms and applicable payment; third-party software and assets keep their licences. We do not withhold customer-owned data or accounts over a payment dispute.
Cancellation, notice and any renewal terms are written into your proposal or statement of work before you accept it. If an engagement ends early, we hand over completed, paid-for work and list any unfinished work separately. For an eligible specialist trial, you can stop within the trial window and pay nothing for eligible trial hours.
How we handle claims, credentials and your data: group credentials, dated ratings, how case figures are signed off, client permissions and data handling.
We start with one service, delivered alongside your current suppliers, and take on the rest as contracts end. The map of who does what today decides the order.
| What the supplier map shows | What we propose | Why |
|---|---|---|
| A supplier's contract is ending | That service moves first | Your other suppliers keep working, so you judge the difference on real work, not slides. |
| One service has the worst problems | That service moves first | At worst, one service got better and nothing else changed. |
| A supplier is doing good work | They stay, and their work goes on the shared plan | A good working relationship is worth keeping. We have worked alongside clients' existing agencies for years. |
| Double work: overlapping tools and licences, the same brief explained four times, two teams editing one template | Shown on the shared plan, with the proposal priced like for like against your current invoices | That is where the real savings come from. One team is not automatically cheaper than five suppliers. |
| We think a supplier should go | A recommendation, with our reasons shown | We are not neutral, because we gain when more work moves to us. The decision stays yours. |
| The combined plan needs a permanent team | A named team with mixed skills at a monthly rate, project manager included | Proposed only once the plan needs it. |
Each service that moves joins the same plan and the same weekly report, tied to your sales number.
No, and you shouldn't. We usually start with one service, where a contract is ending or the problem is worst. We deliver it alongside your current suppliers. Each service that moves joins the same plan and weekly report. So at worst, one service got better and nothing else changed.
Nothing dramatic. Suppliers who do good work can stay. Their work goes on one shared plan, where any overlap is easy to see. We're not neutral, because we gain when more work moves to us. So when we suggest replacing a supplier, we show our reasons. The decision stays yours.
Less than five suppliers are. Each of them is already a single point of failure, and so are you, the only person who sees the whole picture. With us you get a named coordinator and written-down decisions. Work stays in your accounts and code stores, and notice periods are agreed upfront. If we stop performing, you leave with the notes and your assets.
It would be if it were four generalists, but it isn't. We employ the same specialists your suppliers sell: SEO people who do SEO, engineers who build online stores, designers who design. What changes is that they plan together. So the developer knows the campaign date, and the SEO lead sees the release schedule.
You get one weekly report tied to your sales number, with detail for each service underneath. One named person tells you what went live, what's next and what it changed. Dashboards and accounts stay yours, in your name, for anyone who wants detail by channel.
Not automatically. Senior work costs senior money wherever you buy it. The real savings come from removing double work. That means overlapping tools and licences, paid ads on searches you already rank for, and the same brief explained four times. The proposal compares costs like for like with your current invoices, in your own numbers.
Send the brief and an itemised, priced proposal comes back. Or start with the free website review: we measure one page of your website and a person reviews the report.
Reply within four business hours (typical) · One weekly report · NDA standard
Rankings on this topic
Scored on public evidence by the PixelCrayons Index. PixelCrayons is scored like every firm: ranked where it has a case study, listed where it has not.
Last updated
