One senior team,
tuned to your sector.
Digital problems rhyme across industries, but the constraints don't: a store fears replatforming, a SaaS team fears flat pipeline, a startup fears the runway. Each page below maps what your sector is actually up against to the services that answer it.
Delivered in 48 hours · Yours to keep · Direct or white-label
PixelCrayons serves eight sectors with the same senior team. eCommerce and D2C brands, B2B SaaS, funded startups, healthcare, education, real estate & construction, dental and home services. The services underneath are shared: development, marketing, design and AI. But each engagement is scoped around the sector's own constraints, not a generic package. 2,500+ projects delivered across 30+ countries since 2004, direct for brands and white-label for agencies.
Eight industries,
one delivery bench.
Each page maps the sector's real constraints to the services that answer them, and features a published case only where one genuinely matches. No invented vertical trophies, just routing to the work.
The sector changes.
The standards don't.
Whichever page you land on, the engagement underneath is built the same way: a named senior team rather than a rotating cast, an itemised proposal within 48 hours, and the same three-step start: see the published work, take the free website review, then scope a proposal. The cadence is documented on our process page, the pricing shapes are public, and the case studies carry their numbers with them. Sector knowledge changes what we recommend. It never changes how the work is scoped, reported and handed over.
One thing you won't find on these pages: invented vertical trophies. We don't claim "50+ clients" in a sector we can't substantiate, and we don't rebadge stock stats per industry. The aggregate record is the record: 2,500+ projects, 30+ countries, 21 yrs of delivery. Where a published case genuinely matches a sector, that page features it. Where none does yet, the page says so.
What sector experience
actually changes.
Vertical expertise is the most oversold thing in agency marketing. Here is the part that is real, and the part that is not.
What does not change by sector
- Technical SEO. A crawl-budget problem (search engines fetching the wrong pages) is the same problem whether the catalogue sells implants or trainers.
- Page performance. The Core Web Vitals fixes (Google's page-speed scores) that work on a SaaS marketing site work identically on a clinic site.
- Build quality. Accessible markup, sensible state management and a maintainable component tree are not sector opinions.
- How an engagement runs. Named team, itemised proposal, a weekly review in Prism, documented handover: same in every vertical.
What genuinely does change
- What you are allowed to say. Regulated sectors constrain claims before a word of copy is written. A writer who learns that mid-project has already cost you a review cycle.
- Where the buyer actually decides. A funded startup's evaluation runs in days on a founder's laptop. An education purchase runs for a term through a committee. The funnel shape follows.
- Which integrations are non-negotiable. A booking system, a learning platform, a practice-management system or a payment gateway is often the fixed point the rest of the build has to move around.
- What proof persuades. A conversion-rate lift convinces a D2C operator and does nothing for a hospital administrator who needs to know about data handling first.
Which is why the sector pages below map constraints to services rather than reciting vertical credentials. Where a published case genuinely matches your sector, that page features it. Where none does yet, the page says so instead of borrowing one.
Skip the directory. Send the website.
A senior strategist records five minutes on your website: speed, search rankings, AI visibility, conversion leaks. Yours to keep, no strings. Whatever your sector, it's the fastest way to find out what we'd fix first, and if the answer is that you don't need an agency yet, the recording says that too.
Delivered in 48 hours · No retainer required · Yours to keep
Your engagement, week to week,
in one workspace.
Whatever your sector, the engagement runs in one Prism workspace you log into: requests, approvals, tasks and the weekly review, with each decision recorded.
- 01
Requests and approvals
One queue, one owner, one due date.
- 02
Weekly review
Each decision recorded, with the expectation attached.
- 03
Actions checked against outcome
What we did and what happened, side by side.
Frequently
asked.
For the technical layer, no: a crawl budget problem, a Core Web Vitals failure or a checkout bug behaves the same in every sector. For the commercial layer, yes: what you are allowed to claim, who signs off, how long the decision takes and what proof persuades are all sector-specific. Getting them wrong costs review cycles rather than rankings. We are explicit on each page about which kind of problem we are solving for you.
Usually, and the six are the sectors we are asked for most rather than the limit of what we take on. The filter is whether your constraint resembles one we have solved: a regulated claims process, a long committee purchase, a catalogue at scale, a technical buyer. Describe the situation and you will get a straight answer, including a no where a specialist would serve you better.
Because we cannot substantiate them per sector, and a rebadged statistic is a fabrication with better formatting. The aggregate record is the record. Where a published case study genuinely matches a sector, that page features it. Where none does yet, the page says so rather than borrowing proof from an adjacent vertical.
The specialists are the same senior bench. What changes is the briefing they get and the constraints written into the scope: compliance boundaries, required integrations, the approval chain. Sector knowledge changes what we recommend and how the work is framed; it does not mean a different, unnamed team appears behind the sector page you clicked.
By treating it as a scoping input rather than a final review step. Claim constraints, data-handling requirements and approval routes are agreed before copy or build starts, and the proposal names who signs off on what. That is the difference between compliance costing you a fortnight at the end and costing you an hour at the beginning.
Start with the constraint rather than the label. Each page opens by naming what that sector is genuinely up against and maps it to the services that answer it. So the fastest route is to read the constraint paragraph on two or three pages and pick whichever describes your situation most accurately, even if its sector heading is not an exact match for your business.
Bring us the constraint.
Keep the plan.
Tell us what your sector is squeezing you on: acquisition, platform, pipeline, runway. A senior strategist will map the way through. Proposal within 48 hours if you want one; no obligation if you don't.
Response in 48 hours · NDA standard · Direct or white-label
Last updated