Search your name.
Like what you see?

Usually no, and be wary of any reputation management company that says yes for a fee. Platforms remove reviews that break their own rules (fake, off-topic, harassment, conflicts of interest) and where a review genuinely qualifies, we flag it through the proper channels. Everything else stays. What actually works is slower and better. It's a calm, factual reply (read by hundreds of buyers who will never write a review themselves), fixing the process failure the review exposed, and a steady stream of genuine reviews so one angry voice stops being the whole story.

No. Fake reviews are fraud: banned by every platform, illegal under consumer-protection law in a growing number of markets, and increasingly easy for platforms to detect and purge, taking your rating and your credibility with them. What we build instead is an asking machine: identifying genuinely happy customers, asking at the moment satisfaction peaks, and making the review effortless to leave. And no review-gating: filtering happy customers toward the form and unhappy ones away from it breaches platform terms too.

No: nobody guarantees rankings and keeps the promise, for brand terms or any others. What we can say is that brand queries are the friendliest territory in search. Your own site, profiles you control and content you publish are typically the strongest candidates for your own name, so realistic progress is the norm rather than the exception. The plan states what we expect to move and how we'll measure it: expectations, in writing, are as far as any promise should stretch.

It depends on the pile. Listings and profile cleanup is the fast lane, typically weeks, because you control the assets. Review momentum takes months and tracks your actual customer volume, since every review has to be real. Outranking established negative content is the slowest work of all, often quarters, because it means publishing and promoting something genuinely stronger. Anyone quoting days is describing suppression tricks that collapse at the next algorithm update.

Then it's a legal question before it's a search one. Defamation, impersonation and privacy violations have formal routes (court orders and platform legal processes) that a lawyer should drive; we're not lawyers and won't pretend to be. What we do is run the search side in parallel: documenting where the content ranks, pursuing the platform-policy reports that don't need a courtroom, and building the earned coverage that matters however the legal route ends, because courts move slower than search results.

They share machinery (rankings are rankings) but the job is different. SEO grows visibility for what you sell; brand reputation management defends trust at the exact moment someone checks who you are. It adds disciplines SEO doesn't carry: review operations, listings governance, response playbooks and monitoring. If your problem is being invisible rather than being misrepresented, you likely want the digital-presence engagement instead, and we'll say so on the first call.