Skip to content
Rankings · Worldwide · the PixelCrayons Index

Best Social Media Marketing Agencies
(October 2026)

By The PixelCrayons team · Updated 26 October 2026 · 10 firms scored

October 2026 edition

Ignite Visibility leads with 83.2 out of 100, followed by WebFX and Thrive Internet Marketing Agency. We scored 10 firms from 16 candidates on the same public evidence. That means Clutch reviews, social media marketing case studies, published pricing, track record and recent work. PixelCrayons publishes this list and is scored the same way.

The ranking

10 firms
ranked by their score.

Scored out of 100 by the PixelCrayons Index from 16 candidates. Open a firm's scorecard for every source and the date we checked it.

Best Social Media Marketing Agencies: rank, firm, PixelCrayons Index score, Clutch rating and reviews, minimum project, hourly rate and headquarters
#FirmIndex scoreClutchMin projectHourlyHQ
1Ignite Visibility

Franchise and multi-location brands wanting Meta lead-generation campaigns alongside organic social management

83.2out of 100
4.8 · 175 reviews$1,000+$100 - $149San Diego, CA, United States
2WebFX

US small and mid-size businesses wanting social media run as one channel inside a wider SEO, PPC and web programme

70.7out of 100
4.9 · 450 reviews$1,000+Not shownHarrisburg, PA, United States
3Thrive Internet Marketing Agency

Small and mid-size businesses wanting organic posting, community management and paid social on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, YouTube and Pinterest, with white-label options for agencies

70.4out of 100
4.6 · 112 reviews$1,000+$100 - $149Arlington, TX, United States
4PixelCrayons

Brands and agencies (direct or white-label) wanting organic social planning, posting, community management and reporting on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok, X and YouTube, with paid Meta run by its PPC team and indicative prices published ($375 to $3,125 a month retainer)

59.7out of 100
4.9 · 18 reviews$5,000+< $25Noida, India
5Avenue Z

Consumer brands wanting TikTok Shop, creator and UGC programmes with paid social amplification

57.6out of 100
4.7 · 15 reviews$10,000+$150 - $199Miami, FL, United States
6Disruptive Advertising

eCommerce and lead-generation brands wanting paid social (Meta and other platforms) managed by a paid-media team

55.6out of 100
4.8 · 371 reviews$5,000+$150 - $199Pleasant Grove, UT, United States
7NoGood

Consumer and tech brands wanting TikTok-led organic content that is then scaled with paid social

55.3out of 100
5.0 · 3 reviewsNot shownNot shownNew York, NY, United States
8fishbat

B2B and consumer brands wanting social media within a wider strategy, content and paid campaign

51.8out of 100
4.8 · 16 reviews$1,000+$150 - $199New York
9Single Grain

B2B and consumer brands wanting paid social on LinkedIn and Meta as part of a growth marketing engagement

44.8out of 100
4.8 · 12 reviews$10,000+Not shownLos Angeles, CA, United States
10Power Digital

Consumer and real-estate brands wanting influencer campaigns and dynamic Facebook ads run with wider growth marketing

44.5out of 100
4.8 · 66 reviews$5,000+$100 - $149San Diego, CA, United States

Clutch figures as shown on each firm's Clutch profile on the date in its scorecard. Profiles: Ignite Visibility, WebFX, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, PixelCrayons, Avenue Z, Disruptive Advertising, NoGood, fishbat, Single Grain, Power Digital.

What the data shows

What the figures show
about these firms.

Worked out from the 10 firms on this list, as checked on 26 Oct 2026. They change when the figures change.

4.8
Median Clutch rating across the firms listed
42
Median number of Clutch reviews per firm
3 of 10
Firms that publish prices on their own site
4 of 9
Firms with a Clutch minimum project under $5,000
9 of 10
Firms with a dedicated social media marketing service page
6 of 10
Firms with dated work or news in the last 12 months
How to choose

How to choose
the right firm for you.

The score ranks firms overall. Your project decides which one fits. This list is written for businesses that want an agency to run organic or paid social, from content and community to ad campaigns on Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok and others.

Paid social that brings sales
Look for case studies that give cost per result or revenue, not likes.
Organic content and community
Look for examples of content plans, posting cadence and reporting on reach and engagement.
B2B on LinkedIn
Look for LinkedIn campaigns with leads or pipeline figures.
Scorecards

Every score,
with its sources.

For each firm: its points on each part of the score, who it suits, one thing to check before you choose, and the pages we read.

  1. 1Ignite Visibility

    83.2 / 100

    Client evidence
    28.9/35
    Discipline depth
    21.8/30
    Transparency
    15.0/15
    Track record
    7.6/10
    Recent activity
    10.0/10
    Best for
    Franchise and multi-location brands wanting Meta lead-generation campaigns alongside organic social management
    Check before you choose
    No social media fees published; its social case studies are PDF summaries, most of them for franchise brands
    Team
    US-based team (San Diego, CA)
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 4.8 from 175 reviews (adjusted 4.75), checked 12 Oct 2026
    • Google reviews: 4.7 from 121 reviews, checked 13 Oct 2026
    • Service page for social media marketing on ignitevisibility.com
    • 5 social media marketing case studies counted on the firm's site, for example case 1, 2, 3
    • Most recent: Weekly news post published, 23 Oct 2026
    • Published pricing: SEO page FAQ states its SEO programs typically require $2,000 to $10,000+ a month

    Ignite Visibility: full profile and score history

  2. 2WebFX

    70.7 / 100

    Client evidence
    30.4/35
    Discipline depth
    16.3/30
    Transparency
    4.0/15
    Track record
    10.0/10
    Recent activity
    10.0/10
    Best for
    US small and mid-size businesses wanting social media run as one channel inside a wider SEO, PPC and web programme
    Check before you choose
    No social media fees published on its own site; three of its case studies give social figures, and in each the social work sits inside a multi-channel programme
    Team
    US-based team (Harrisburg, PA)
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 4.9 from 450 reviews (adjusted 4.82), checked 12 Oct 2026
    • Google reviews: 4.5 from 204 reviews, checked 13 Oct 2026
    • Service page for social media marketing on webfx.com
    • 3 social media marketing case studies counted on the firm's site, for example case 1, 2, 3
    • Most recent: Blog post published, 23 Oct 2026
    • No prices published on the firm's own site.

    WebFX: full profile and score history

  3. 3Thrive Internet Marketing Agency

    70.4 / 100

    Client evidence
    26.7/35
    Discipline depth
    16.3/30
    Transparency
    8.0/15
    Track record
    9.5/10
    Recent activity
    10.0/10
    Best for
    Small and mid-size businesses wanting organic posting, community management and paid social on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, YouTube and Pinterest, with white-label options for agencies
    Check before you choose
    No social media fees published on its main service page, and its social case studies carry no campaign dates (the Petersen Games study is dated 2019)
    Team
    US-based team (Arlington, TX)
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 4.6 from 112 reviews (adjusted 4.67), checked 12 Oct 2026
    • Google reviews: 4.8 from 171 reviews, checked 13 Oct 2026
    • Service page for social media marketing on thriveagency.com
    • 3 social media marketing case studies counted on the firm's site, for example case 1, 2, 3
    • Most recent: Blog post published, 6 Jul 2026
    • No prices published on the firm's own site.

    Thrive Internet Marketing Agency: full profile and score history

  4. 4PixelCrayons

    59.7 / 100

    Client evidence
    13.9/35
    Discipline depth
    10.8/30
    Transparency
    15.0/15
    Track record
    10.0/10
    Recent activity
    10.0/10
    Best for
    Brands and agencies (direct or white-label) wanting organic social planning, posting, community management and reporting on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok, X and YouTube, with paid Meta run by its PPC team and indicative prices published ($375 to $3,125 a month retainer)
    Check before you choose
    One social case study on its own site (Truck Lenders: SMO and SMM on Facebook alongside Google Ads, with no social figures given), and social is one of several lines at 5% in its Clutch service focus
    Team
    Team in India (Noida) serving clients worldwide
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 4.9 from 18 reviews (adjusted 4.22), checked 12 Oct 2026
    • Google reviews: 3.8 from 63 reviews, checked 13 Oct 2026
    • Service page for social media marketing on pixelcrayons.com
    • 1 social media marketing case study counted on the firm's site, for example case 1
    • Most recent: Blog post published, 23 Oct 2026
    • Published pricing: Pricing page lists projects at $500 to $80K, retainers at $300 to $8K a month and dedicated teams at $4K to $20K a month, with a per-service rate card

    PixelCrayons: full profile and score history

  5. 5Avenue Z

    57.6 / 100

    Client evidence
    19.8/35
    Discipline depth
    16.3/30
    Transparency
    8.0/15
    Track record
    3.6/10
    Recent activity
    10.0/10
    Best for
    Consumer brands wanting TikTok Shop, creator and UGC programmes with paid social amplification
    Check before you choose
    No social media fees published; Clutch shows a $10,000 minimum project and a $150 to $199 hourly band
    Team
    US-based team (Miami, FL)
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 4.7 from 15 reviews (adjusted 4.55), checked 12 Oct 2026
    • Google reviews: 5.0 from 1 reviews, checked 13 Oct 2026
    • Service page for social media marketing on avenuez.com
    • 3 social media marketing case studies counted on the firm's site, for example case 1, 2, 3
    • Most recent: Case study published, 30 Jan 2026
    • No prices published on the firm's own site.

    Avenue Z: full profile and score history

  6. 6Disruptive Advertising

    55.6 / 100

    Client evidence
    29.1/35
    Discipline depth
    10.8/30
    Transparency
    8.0/15
    Track record
    7.8/10
    Recent activity
    0.0/10
    Best for
    eCommerce and lead-generation brands wanting paid social (Meta and other platforms) managed by a paid-media team
    Check before you choose
    Its paid social page links one social case study (a PDF) and gives no fixed fee ('a couple thousand dollars' for its guided option); Clutch shows a $5,000 minimum project and a $150 to $199 hourly band
    Team
    US-based team (Pleasant Grove, UT)
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 4.8 from 371 reviews (adjusted 4.76), checked 12 Oct 2026
    • Google reviews: 4.7 from 299 reviews, checked 13 Oct 2026
    • Service page for social media marketing on disruptiveadvertising.com
    • 1 social media marketing case study counted on the firm's site, for example case 1
    • No dated activity found in the last 12 months.
    • No prices published on the firm's own site.

    Disruptive Advertising: full profile and score history

  7. 7NoGood

    55.3 / 100

    Client evidence
    17.1/35
    Discipline depth
    16.3/30
    Transparency
    7.0/15
    Track record
    5.0/10
    Recent activity
    10.0/10
    Best for
    Consumer and tech brands wanting TikTok-led organic content that is then scaled with paid social
    Check before you choose
    Its homepage FAQ states an average retainer above $20,000 a month, so smaller budgets may sit under its usual range
    Team
    US-based team (New York, NY)
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 5.0 from 3 reviews (adjusted 4.50), checked 12 Oct 2026
    • Google reviews: 4.6 from 9 reviews, checked 13 Oct 2026
    • Service page for social media marketing on nogood.io
    • 3 social media marketing case studies counted on the firm's site, for example case 1, 2, 3
    • Most recent: Blog post published, 22 Oct 2026
    • Published pricing: Homepage FAQ on what it costs to hire NoGood states its average retainer is above $20,000 a month; engagements are custom scoped

    NoGood: full profile and score history

  8. 8fishbat

    51.8 / 100

    Client evidence
    21.3/35
    Discipline depth
    10.8/30
    Transparency
    8.0/15
    Track record
    6.8/10
    Recent activity
    5.0/10
    Best for
    B2B and consumer brands wanting social media within a wider strategy, content and paid campaign
    Check before you choose
    One social case study on its own site (Clarity Benefit Solutions, Facebook fan growth of 276% a month in a four-month 2022 campaign) and no standalone social media service page; Clutch shows a $1,000 minimum project
    Team
    US-based team (New York)
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 4.8 from 16 reviews (adjusted 4.61), checked 23 Oct 2026
    • No Google Business listing found, checked 23 Oct 2026.
    • Service page for social media marketing on fishbat.com
    • 1 social media marketing case study counted on the firm's site, for example case 1
    • Most recent: Clutch review, 15 Aug 2025
    • No prices published on the firm's own site.

    fishbat: full profile and score history

  9. 9Single Grain

    44.8 / 100

    Client evidence
    19.9/35
    Discipline depth
    13.5/30
    Transparency
    4.0/15
    Track record
    7.5/10
    Recent activity
    0.0/10
    Best for
    B2B and consumer brands wanting paid social on LinkedIn and Meta as part of a growth marketing engagement
    Check before you choose
    Clutch shows a $10,000 minimum project; no social media fees published, and its two social case studies were counted from the cards on its paid social page
    Team
    US-based team (Los Angeles, CA)
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 4.8 from 12 reviews (adjusted 4.57), checked 12 Oct 2026
    • Service page for social media marketing on singlegrain.com
    • 2 social media marketing case studies counted on the firm's site, for example case 1, 2
    • No dated activity found in the last 12 months.
    • No prices published on the firm's own site.

    Single Grain: full profile and score history

  10. 10Power Digital

    44.5 / 100

    Client evidence
    25.9/35
    Discipline depth
    2.8/30
    Transparency
    8.0/15
    Track record
    7.9/10
    Recent activity
    0.0/10
    Best for
    Consumer and real-estate brands wanting influencer campaigns and dynamic Facebook ads run with wider growth marketing
    Check before you choose
    Only one social case study could be read because other pages on its site returned HTTP 403; Clutch shows a $5,000 minimum project
    Team
    US-based team (San Diego, CA)
    Sources
    • Clutch profile: 4.8 from 66 reviews (adjusted 4.65), checked 12 Oct 2026
    • Google reviews: 4.3 from 37 reviews, checked 13 Oct 2026
    • No dedicated social media marketing service page found.
    • 1 social media marketing case study counted on the firm's site, for example case 1
    • No dated activity found in the last 12 months.
    • No prices published on the firm's own site.

    Power Digital: full profile and score history

How this list is made

How this list is made,
and our interest in it.

PixelCrayons publishes this list and is a social media marketing firm itself. It is scored on the same evidence and weights as every other firm and sits at number 4 with 59.7. ValueCoders, our sister company in the Vinove group, is left out of every list. That way the group never holds two places.

No firm paid to be listed or asked to be. We considered 16 firms and scored those with enough public evidence to score fairly. Every figure links to the page we read it from, with the date.

Read the full PixelCrayons Index method, or download this list as CSV. You are free to reuse our scores and this compilation under CC BY 4.0 if you credit PixelCrayons. The figures we read from Clutch and the firms’ own sites remain theirs. A listed firm can correct its data: email hello@pixelcrayons.com with Rankings correction in the subject line.

If you are weighing PixelCrayons too: Social media marketing at PixelCrayons.

From PixelCrayons

Start with a free review,
or tell us about the project.

This box is PixelCrayons's own offer. It plays no part in any score or position on this list.

Free campaign review

Have one campaign reviewed: paid ads, email or social

You give: The campaign you want reviewed: paid ads, email or social. You get: A short video on one campaign with the top three fixes, typically within four business hours.

Rather start with your website? Get the free website review

A note to PixelCrayons

Tell us about your social media marketing project

A specialist replies, typically within four business hours (Monday to Friday, 9 am to 6 pm IST). Writing to us changes nothing on this list.

Vetting a partner from a list like this? (PDF, 12 pages, 934 KB)

Questions

Frequently
asked.

It plans and publishes content, runs the community, and manages paid campaigns on networks such as Meta, LinkedIn and TikTok. Good agencies report on leads or sales, not only on followers and likes.

Every firm is scored out of 100 by the PixelCrayons Index: client reviews on Clutch, depth of social media marketing work, published pricing, track record and recent activity. The weights are fixed and published, and no firm paid to be listed.

Only where it qualifies like any other firm: it must offer the service and show at least one case study in it. When it's listed, it's scored on the same evidence and weights as everyone else and sits wherever that score puts it.

Every month. Each firm's figures are checked again, the scores are recalculated, and the changelog on this page says what moved and why.

Yes. Any listed firm can send a correction with a source to hello@pixelcrayons.com with Rankings correction in the subject line. We check it, update the figure and log the change on this page.

Changelog

What changed
in each edition.

Updated every month. Each edition is checked again from the sources.

  1. First edition: service pages, case studies and recent work read on 26 October 2026, with Clutch and Google figures read by hand.