
Parvessh Agarwal
Founder & CEO
An entrepreneur at heart. He links business analysis, strategy, clear goals and ROI to practical technology.
LinkedIn →Generative AI makes new text, images or code from a request. A developer builds that into your product, for example drafting product descriptions, summarising documents or answering in your brand's voice. Many of these features run on OpenAI's models; others suit Anthropic or open models. PixelCrayons scopes the role and writes the proposal. We then find and supply the developer. You interview them before anything is signed.
Interview before signing · One contact throughout

Tell us about the role
Send a short brief. Once we have a complete brief, we confirm the date you will receive your itemised proposal.
Hire a generative AI or OpenAI developer through PixelCrayons, with one point of contact. We find a developer who has shipped generation features in live products. They test the output on your real content and add review steps where it matters. You interview them before signing. One account team handles escalation, billing and status.
Real projects for real clients, with results we can show.
Each developer is vetted on generation features in live products, not only demos. Each one is matched to your gap.
Practical notes for briefing, interviewing and working with the person who builds your generation features.
Getting a good result once is easy. Getting good results every time is the job. The developer builds test sets from your real content and scores each change against them. They tune instructions and examples for your brand's voice. They add review steps and filters. They also track cost per request. Expect more time on testing than on clever prompts.
Ask the candidate about a generation feature they shipped, and the worst output it produced after launch. Strong candidates name a real case, such as an invented fact or a tone that was off for the brand. Ask how they caught it and stopped it happening again. Then ask how they measure quality between releases. A good answer names a test set and a way of scoring it.
Before the first day, gather good examples of the content you want, and a few bad ones. Write down your brand's voice rules and the things you must never say. Decide who holds the provider account, such as OpenAI, and set a spending limit. Agree which content needs a person's approval before it goes out. Settle these early and the first week goes on building.
The common failure is shipping without a way to measure quality. Output drifts and nobody notices until a customer does. The second failure is no review step where one was needed, so a wrong claim goes live. The third is one expensive model for every task. Write down what good output looks like, what must never appear and who reviews it.
If you need answers drawn from your own documents with sources, a RAG and LLM engineer fits better. If the task is moving data between tools, a workflow automation engineer is simpler. If you need a model trained on your own data to predict or classify, hire a machine learning engineer. This hire works best when you know what the content is for.
We sign an NDA, and you talk PixelCrayons through the product, the content and the gap.
We confirm when your proposal will arrive. We name the developer whose track record fits. You interview them directly before anything is signed.
You confirm the scope, the payment and the access we need. Nothing starts before this.
Once they have code and API access, they review your product and content and join your stand-ups.
Add a specialist when the feature needs one, or step down once it ships. The same PixelCrayons account team handles it throughout.
You make requests, give approvals and see the weekly review in your Prism workspace. Each decision is written down with the result it was meant to bring. See how Prism runs the work →
Meet the people who will do the work before you sign
PixelCrayons defines the role, supplies the developer and manages your account. You deal with one contact and get the right builder. It is always clear who answers for the output.
Every developer we propose has shipped a generation feature in a live product before yours. They are vetted against our own delivery standards. A demo shows the best output. A track record shows what happens with the worst.
PixelCrayons scopes the generative AI role and writes the proposal. One PixelCrayons team then handles escalation, billing and status. Our developer builds the feature.
You hear early if the job needs a different specialist, such as a RAG engineer. You also hear if it is really a scoped project for our generative AI development service. We never stretch a hire to cover work they can't do.
You sign with PixelCrayons, and we answer for every commitment in the proposal. That holds for as long as the work runs. It stays clear who answers for the feature long after it goes live.
An in-house hire is worth it once generative AI becomes core, ongoing product work. We'll tell you plainly if that is where you are. Most generation features start smaller, or fit a scoped project better than a hire.
| Hiring it yourself | Through PixelCrayons | |
|---|---|---|
| Time to a working feature | A full recruiting cycle of sourcing, interviews and notice periods, then a prototype that isn't ready for customers | Eligible work can typically start two to three business days after scope, payment and required access are confirmed |
| Vetting | A demo with good examples. Poor output shows up after launch | A track record on generation features in live products, checked against our own standards |
| Management work | All yours: recruiting, then checking every kind of output the feature can produce | PixelCrayons' account team handles the day-to-day contact; you review the work and set priorities |
| Number of suppliers | However many agencies or freelancers it takes to cover the gap | One proposal and one point of contact, whichever developer is assigned |
| Risk when it doesn't work | Output quality drifts and nobody notices until a customer does | If the fit is wrong, we propose someone else; leaving takes a handover call with notes, not a negotiation |

Founder & CEO
An entrepreneur at heart. He links business analysis, strategy, clear goals and ROI to practical technology.
LinkedIn →
Technical Manager
Brings technical work, client updates and project management together, so work moves smoothly from brief to launch.
LinkedIn →Every engagement
Know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue.
All engagements. Roles may be combined and vary with your engagement.
Each one says where it applies and links to its full terms.
At least four hours a day inside your core working hours. Two hours plus a daily written handover for the US West Coast.
Managed specialists only; not a staffing promise for project teams.
Full termsYour materials remain yours. Bespoke deliverable rights, licences and handover are agreed before work starts.
All engagements.
Full termsKnow who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue.
All engagements. Roles may be combined and vary with your engagement.
Full termsA freelancer can be the right choice for a single, well-defined task. We are set up for work that needs an accountable team: a named coordinator, delivery reviewed by QA and a senior lead before release, and continuity arrangements written into the engagement. Confidentiality, ownership and escalation terms are agreed in writing before work starts.
Your engineers work at least four hours a day inside your core working hours. We set the window with you before the engagement starts and hold it for as long as the engagement runs. For the US West Coast the live overlap is two hours each morning, with a written handover at the end of every Indian day. We do not run night shifts: engineers who work nights leave quickly, and keeping the same people on your team matters more to us than a longer overlap.
For eligible managed specialists, yes: up to 14 calendar days or 80 logged working hours, whichever comes first. Stop within it and eligible trial hours are free; continue and they're billed at the agreed rate. Unpaid trial work stays ours. Project work and other roles get a paid pilot with scope, acceptance criteria, duration and fee agreed first.
Cancellation, notice and any renewal terms are written into your proposal or statement of work before you accept it. If an engagement ends early, we hand over completed, paid-for work and list any unfinished work separately. For an eligible specialist trial, you can stop within the trial window and pay nothing for eligible trial hours.
How we handle claims, credentials and your data: group credentials, dated ratings, how case figures are signed off, client permissions and data handling.
We propose developers vetted on generation features in live products. Your interview is the second check. These five questions show whether a candidate ships reliable output or only good demos.
| Ask about | A strong answer | A weak answer |
|---|---|---|
| A generation feature they shipped, and its worst output after launch | A real case, such as an invented fact or an off-brand tone, and how they stopped it happening again. | The launch, and nothing after it. |
| How they measure quality between releases | A test set built from your real content, and a way of scoring it. | Reading a few outputs and judging by eye. |
| Which model they would use, and why | A choice per feature on quality, cost and speed, with OpenAI, Anthropic or an open model. | The newest model, for everything. |
| What reaches customers without a person checking it | A clear line: low-risk drafts go straight out, claims and offers get reviewed. | Everything, once it looks good in testing. |
| When generative AI is the wrong tool | A RAG build when answers must cite your documents, or a template when the text never changes. | Never. Every feature can be generated. |
Answers that must quote your own documents usually suit a RAG and LLM engineer. A defined generative AI feature with an end date often fits our generative AI development service better than a hire.
The developer you interview and work with comes from our Vinove group engineering team. PixelCrayons scopes the role, writes the one proposal and stays your contact throughout. You contract with PixelCrayons, and we answer for every commitment on this page.
Yes. Many generation features run on OpenAI's models, and the developers we propose have built with them. They also know Anthropic and open models. If another model suits a feature better on cost or quality, they will tell you and show you the test results.
It depends on what you need. A hire fits when you want a person joining your team over time. A defined feature with a clear scope and end date often fits our generative AI development service (/ai/generative-ai-development) better. We'll tell you on the first call which one fits.
One. You sign with PixelCrayons, and one account team handles the whole relationship. Escalation, billing and status updates all come through the PixelCrayons account team you signed with.
Tell us early, and we propose a replacement. The new developer gets the test sets, voice rules and notes the first one kept. So a switch costs days, not a restart.
Tell PixelCrayons about the product and the content you want to generate. We scope the role, supply the developer under a written proposal and stay your point of contact throughout. You interview the actual person before anything is signed. If a scoped project fits better than a hire, we'll say so on the first call.
Interview before signing · One account team
Last updated