Skip to content

An MVP, scoped honestly
before anyone commits to a build.

MVP development for a minimum viable product (MVP). That is the smallest working version that tests your main idea, not one built to impress investors. PixelCrayons is your point of contact. We scope what needs building first, write the proposal and build it, with one account team throughout.

Reply within four business hours (typical) · One contact, start to finish

Brands our teams have delivered for

  • Hello Peter
  • Gruber Logistics
  • Delhivery
  • Thomson Reuters
  • Qatar Airways
  • Grundfos
  • Save
  • BERD
  • Yale University
  • Kuwait Police
  • Dubai Police
  • Panasonic
  • Infosys
  • Kia
  • Hitachi
  • Orange Business Services
What we do

PixelCrayons scopes and builds your MVP, under one proposal and one account team. We scope the smallest version that tests your idea, rather than the longest feature list your budget allows. We stay your account owner throughout. We also do any website, store or marketing work alongside the build.

  1. We scope only what tests your main ideaThe smallest version that tests your assumption, and a plain no to features that don't belong.
  2. Built properly, front and backFront and back end built on a solid structure, not quick fixes that need rewriting later.
  3. One proposal for the whole buildOne written proposal covering the scope and the build, with pricing and acceptance conditions in the same document.
Our work

See what we've built
and the results it brought.

Real projects for real clients, with results we can show.

All case studies →
Where the work happens
ShopifyWooCommerceMagentoWordPressWebflowKlaviyoGoogle AdsMeta AdsGA4Next.js
  • PixelCrayons: scoping and your point of contact
  • PixelCrayons: the company you sign with, answering for every commitment
  • One coordinated proposal, one account team
  • Delivering since 2004
What you get

One contact runs your MVP,
from scope to launch.

01

We scope only what tests your main idea

PixelCrayons scopes the smallest version that tests the thing you're unsure about. If a feature you ask for doesn't belong in a first version, we say so plainly.

PixelCrayons
02

Built properly, front and back

Our engineers build the product to the agreed brief. That covers the front end people see and the back end behind it. It sits on a solid structure, not quick fixes that will need rewriting later.

Engineering
03

One proposal for the whole build

One written proposal covers the scope and the build. The pricing and the sign-off conditions are in the same document. PixelCrayons answers for all of it.

Every engagement
04

What happens after the MVP

If the MVP proves your idea, the same account team scopes what comes next. That may be more engineering, or web and marketing work.

After launch
05

We still do the marketing and website work

A landing page, a waitlist site or the marketing for your launch sits in the same proposal. The same account team runs it.

PixelCrayons
How it works

From your brief to a working MVP,
scoped honestly.

01
Start

Brief and a call

We sign an NDA and you tell us the idea you need to test. Then we scope the smallest version that tests it.

02
Once the brief is complete

Itemised proposal

We confirm the date your proposal arrives. It names the scope, the price and what each part covers.

03
Your decision

You sign off

You confirm the scope, the payment and the access we need. Nothing starts before this.

04
Typically 2 to 3 business days later

The build starts

Our engineers start on the agreed scope. Our account team is your one contact.

05
On the date in your proposal

The MVP, and what it showed

You get the MVP and an honest read on what it showed. The same account team scopes whatever comes next.

Inside Prism

Your engagement, week to week,
in one workspace.

Prism is the client workspace where your requests, approvals, tasks and weekly reviews live.

Some engagements include Prism, our client workspace, and your proposal says whether yours does. Where it does, your build runs in a workspace you log into: requests, approvals, the task list and the weekly review, beside the repository your team already owns.

  • 01

    Requests and approvals

    One queue, beside the repository your team owns.

  • 02

    Owned tasks

    Every task has one owner and a date.

  • 03

    Weekly review

    Each decision recorded, with the expectation attached.

How we report it, in Prism

The delivery record,
you can read without a stand-up.

What you receive in month one

Development is reported as artefacts in your own tools, not a status call. In the first month you receive the technical audit of the current codebase, the delivery plan broken into reviewed increments with acceptance criteria, and the environment map showing where code runs and who can deploy it. The weekly review in Prism lists what merged, what was reviewed, and what is blocked and by whom.

  • 01Technical audit: the current codebase, its risks, and the order of fixes
  • 02Delivery plan: increments with acceptance criteria and review owners
  • 03Environment map: development, staging and production, and who deploys
  • 04Weekly review in Prism: merged, in review, blocked, and the reason for each block
  • 05Definition of done: tests, review, accessibility and performance checks per increment

Related workCasadar: a bilingual marketplace for everything that makes a home.Home & Interiors · Marketplace · A different discipline, so it is linked here rather than presented as proof of this one.

Who is accountable

The people responsible
for your work.

Leadership and how we’re built →
Parvessh Agarwal

Parvessh Agarwal

Founder & CEO

An entrepreneur at heart. He links business analysis, strategy, clear goals and ROI to practical technology.

LinkedIn →
Saundaraya Gupta

Saundaraya Gupta

Technical Manager

Brings technical work, client updates and project management together, so work moves smoothly from brief to launch.

LinkedIn →

Every engagement

A named coordinator and escalation contact

Know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue.

All engagements. Roles may be combined and vary with your engagement.

Full terms →
Before you sign

Our commitments

Each one says where it applies and links to its full terms.

Response and start times

We typically respond within four business hours. Eligible engagements can typically start within two to three business days after scope, payment and required access are confirmed.

Business hours are Monday to Friday, 9:00 am to 6:00 pm IST, excluding published company holidays. Typical expectations, not guaranteed service levels.

Full terms

Clear IP & Ownership Terms

Your materials remain yours. Bespoke deliverable rights, licences and handover are agreed before work starts.

All engagements.

Full terms

Clear Delivery & Escalation Ownership

Know who coordinates your engagement, who owns the work and how to escalate an issue.

All engagements. Roles may be combined and vary with your engagement.

Full terms

How we handle claims, credentials and your data: group credentials, dated ratings, how case figures are signed off, client permissions and data handling.

Cutting the scope

Version one or version two:
where each request goes.

We scope the smallest version that tests your idea, not the longest feature list your budget allows. This is how we sort what you ask for before we write the proposal.

What you ask forWhere it goesWhy
The feature that tests the assumption you are unsure aboutVersion oneIt is the reason the MVP exists. We judge every other request against it.
A feature that makes the investor deck look completeVersion twoIt does not test the assumption, and we say so plainly rather than build it in.
The architecture underneathVersion one, built properlyWe build it on a solid structure, not quick fixes that need rewriting later.
A landing page, a waitlist site or the launch marketingAlongside the build, in the same proposalThe same account team coordinates it with the build.
A bespoke product at any stage, full product engineering or IoTCustom Software Development insteadThis page is only the first version, built to test an idea before you commit more.
Whatever comes after the MVP proves the assumptionScoped by the same account team after launchYou get the MVP and an honest view of what it showed, without a new sales pitch.

The proposal covers the scope and the build. The pricing and sign-off conditions are in the same document.

Questions

Frequently
asked.

Our Vinove group engineering team does the engineering. PixelCrayons scopes the version worth building first, writes the single proposal and stays your account owner throughout. We also do any website, store or marketing work alongside it. PixelCrayons is the company you contract with, and we answer for every commitment.

That's fine: it is what the first conversation is for. PixelCrayons scopes the smallest version that tests your main idea. If a feature belongs in version two rather than version one, we tell you plainly.

They are related but different. Custom software development (/development/custom-software-development) covers a bespoke build at any stage, including full product engineering and IoT. This page is only about the first version, built to test an idea before you commit more. Either page leads to the right proposal.

One. You sign with PixelCrayons, and we answer for every commitment in the proposal. Problems, billing and progress reports go through the account team you signed with.

There's no flat rate card. The features in scope and the platform choice set the cost, not a page count. Every proposal is priced against your brief. It lists exactly what you get in each part. Once we have a complete brief, we confirm when your proposal arrives.

Scope the version
worth building first.

A scoped, itemised proposal for the first version, with PixelCrayons as your one point of contact and one account owner throughout.

Reply within four business hours (typical) · One account team · One proposal

Rankings on this topic

Scored on public evidence by the PixelCrayons Index. PixelCrayons is scored like every firm: ranked where it has a case study, listed where it has not.

Last updated