DevOps development services that set up pipelines, cloud infrastructure and monitoring so every release is routine: tested before it ships, watched after it lands, rolled back from a rehearsed plan rather than improvised. Built in your own cloud accounts, documented, no lock-in.
Your cloud accounts · Infrastructure as code in your repos · No hosting resale
PixelCrayons builds the delivery infrastructure around your code: CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure as code, environments and observability, in your own cloud accounts. Engagements cover pipeline design and build, infrastructure as code (IaC), staging that mirrors production, monitoring, alerting and rollback discipline, so releases become routine. We are not a hosting reseller: cloud contracts stay yours and everything is documented in your repositories. Proposal within 48 hours; direct for brands, white-label for agencies.
Build, test and deploy automated from commit to production (that's what CI/CD means), with the QA gate enforced by machinery rather than memory. Nothing reaches production that hasn't passed the checks your team agreed to. Pipelines are designed for the failure case as much as the happy path. Clear logs, fast feedback, and a red build that tells you what broke, not merely that something did.
Servers, networks, databases and permissions defined in reviewable, versioned code (Terraform or your tooling of choice) living in your repositories. Environments become reproducible from a file instead of from the memory of whoever set them up. Changes go through review like any other code, and the infrastructure documentation can never drift from reality, because it is the reality.
The most expensive phrase in software is 'works on staging'. We make staging mirror production: same topology, same configuration discipline, same data shape. We add preview environments where they earn their cost, and put secrets into a managed store instead of a shared document. When environments match, a passing test means something; that is the entire point.
Logs, metrics, traces and alerts tuned for signal, wired up while things are calm rather than during the incident. Dashboards that show what the business cares about: errors, delays and volume on the flows that carry revenue. Alerts that page a human only when a human is needed. Alert fatigue is a design failure; quiet, trustworthy monitoring is the deliverable.
Small reversible releases, rollbacks rehearsed until they're boring, feature switches where they buy safety. Runbooks your team can follow at 2am without us on the call. The engagement's endpoint is deliberate: your engineers shipping confidently through infrastructure they understand and own, not a dependency on ours. If you want us to stay on, that's a choice, never a necessity.
Outcomes tied to real engagements, not averages.
Access granted, the existing pipeline, infrastructure and deploy history walked, including what already works and should be left alone.
Findings in plain English and an itemised plan sequenced by risk and payoff: fix first, automate next, leave alone.
The improvement with the biggest payoff ships: a flaky deploy stabilised, a pipeline gate added, the IaC baseline started, in your accounts, reviewed.
Your team is releasing through the improved pipeline, with the rollback path rehearsed and documented: cadence proven, not promised.
Your build runs in a Prism workspace you log into: requests, approvals, the task list and the weekly review, beside the repository your team already owns.
One queue, beside the repository your team owns.
Every task has one owner and a date.
Each decision recorded, with the expectation attached.
An agency drowning in backlog handed us their delivery queue. Dedicated pod, their brand, their tools: velocity up 85%, client never knew we existed.
We worked with PixelCrayons for around three years, with their developers becoming a genuine extension of our team. Having consistent developers who understood the work and could stay with us over the long term made a real difference to continuity and delivery.
Pipelines exist to move other people's work safely. Each neighbour here is a service in its own right, built by the same team the pipeline was.
DevOps work often surfaces the deeper wish: a delivery capability, not just delivery plumbing. Dedicated pods ship with the pipeline discipline built in, under your brand or ours.
No, and we think that's a feature. We are not a hosting reseller: we build and improve delivery infrastructure inside your own cloud accounts. The contracts, billing and root access stay yours throughout. We'll recommend providers, set everything up and document how to run it; if you want ongoing operational help, DevOps as a service is available as a retainer. But you are never in a position where leaving us means losing your infrastructure. Resellers earn margin on your dependence; we'd rather earn the retainer on being useful.
Our DevOps engineering services run on the mainstream tools, deliberately: AWS, Azure and Google Cloud; GitHub Actions and GitLab CI for pipelines; Docker for packaging; Terraform for infrastructure as code; Kubernetes where the scale genuinely warrants it and simpler orchestration where it doesn't. Tool choice follows your constraints (what your team can operate, what you already run, what you can hire for) not our enthusiasms. Where we lack genuine senior depth in a tool you're committed to, we say so and point you elsewhere rather than learn it on your budget.
Probably not, and it's telling how rarely that answer is offered by people selling DevOps. Most products are best served by the least infrastructure that meets the need: a boring, well-observed deployment of a well-structured application beats a resume-driven platform your team can't operate at 2am. We'll recommend Kubernetes when the workloads justify it and say plainly when they don't. Complexity is a cost you pay every day; our job is to make sure you're buying capability with it, not ceremony.
Yes, and improvement is the default, not the consolation prize. Engagements start with an honest read of what you have: what already works is left alone and said so in writing. The plan attacks the sharpest pain first (the flaky deploy, the missing gate, the environment drift) rather than proposing a grand rebuild that pauses delivery for a quarter. You'll have that plan, itemised and priced, within 48 hours. The first improvement is typically in daily use within 14 days of the NDA.
The pipeline is where testing stops being a promise and becomes a mechanism: automated suites run on every merge, and the release gate is enforced by CI rather than by memory. A build that fails its checks simply cannot ship. We build the machinery. Our QA & testing service builds the strategy and suites that run inside it, and every PixelCrayons build ships through that gate as standard. Buy them together and the two teams work from one plan; buy either alone and it dovetails with what you already have.
You own all of it: the cloud accounts were always yours, and the IaC and pipeline definitions live in your repositories. Runbooks, dashboards and credentials are handed over as we go, with IP assignment in the contract. Nothing about your ability to deploy depends on our continued involvement. And yes, agencies buy white-label DevOps services from us regularly, because it's specialist capacity few agencies staff: your brand on the calls, our engineers on the pipeline, NDA-backed with a commitment never to approach your clients. The average partnership runs past two years.
Tell us how you ship today and where it hurts. You'll have a plain read of your pipeline and an itemised plan within 48 hours, built in your accounts, documented as we go, yours to keep either way.
48-hour proposals · Your cloud accounts · NDA standard
Last updated
May we run analytics (Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager) to see which pages are useful? Nothing loads unless you accept, and declining means no analytics script runs at all. No advertising cookies either way. Cookie policy · Privacy policy
