White-label content marketing
your brand on every published piece.

For bench partners, fast: the NDA is signed and the rate card is on file before there's a project, so when your client says yes, a proposal lands within 48 hours and the first branded piece inside 14 days. The first fortnight typically prioritises the content audit and topical map: the foundation every piece of white-label SEO content sits on.

Two layers, one of which happens once. Partner onboarding: intro call, your NDA signed, rate card and capability pack on file, a named contact assigned. Per-client onboarding when a brief lands: you introduce the account in your own words, we audit what's already published, map the topics worth owning, and agree the calendar before anything is drafted, presented in your templates for your client's approval.

Every piece is briefed first (target query, the answer it has to give, who we're interviewing on your client's side, sources to draw on) and you approve the brief before drafting starts. A senior editor checks the draft for accuracy and expertise, then it comes to you in your templates for final sign-off before it ships. Nothing publishes without your review flow, and your client only ever sees your approval on it.

A senior editorial team that does content writing for agencies, not a rotating freelancer pool. Where a piece needs your client's own expertise (a founder's product decisions, an engineer's implementation detail, a clinician's clinical judgment) we run a short interview through you or directly with a contact your client nominates, and write from what we hear rather than guessing at it. That's the difference between a piece that reads like real expertise and one that reads like every other AI-pattern draft in the SERP.

Your client, always. Every piece, brief, topical map and internal-link plan produced during the engagement is the client's property from day one, delivered in your systems, with your agency as the administrator. If either of us ever exits the picture, nothing is held hostage: the library keeps compounding and a proper handover documents how the map was built. Leaving being easy is what makes staying meaningful.

Yes, and it often produces the best result. Some partners keep voice or final sign-off in-house and buy the research, briefing and drafting; others hand us the whole discipline. The split is agreed per client in the scope, and our deliverables are structured so an in-house editor can revise them without asking us how.

That's your call, not ours. Some partners describe us as their content team; others say nothing about who's behind a byline. Either works, because our name appears on no piece, brief or topical map your client ever sees. What's contractual from our side is fixed: we never contact your client, never accept work from them directly, and the disclosure duty runs the other way. If your client ever approaches us, we tell you and decline.

The wholesale content rate card is agreed once, in writing, and every engagement is quoted against it. Quoting a topical map or a calendar of pieces never means renegotiating per brief. You set the retail price and keep the margin; we never see your client invoices, and nothing in a brief or piece reveals what you pay us. Proposals are itemised by deliverable (topical maps, briefs, pieces, refreshes), so an SME interview or a rewrite shows up as its own line rather than padding the word count, and there are no platform-fee markups hiding in the middle. Pieces are also priced per unit on the rate card. See the partner rates on agencies.pixelcrayons.com.